DISADVANTAGES OF COMMITTEE
The use of a committee always contain evils within him, which caused many corporate leaders tend not to use this committee.
The main evil is in addition to administrative costs may also increase the job or task is too long in doing. It is already clear that by adding a committee in the organizational structure will add administrative costs, but the worst aspect is that to take a decision on the need for a long time before the committee takes a decision first held an investigation and should be asked their opinions of each who are members of the committee concerned. Such circumstances are sometimes used by pemimipin to delay implementation of the decision. So, if someone wants something that leaders around the bush extend its implementation, then by appointing a committee on the realization that it can be. Koontz says "... That time Some committees are appointed by a manager he does not want Pls any action to Ensure ... one of the surest way to delay the handling of a problem and even to postpone indefinitely a decision is to appoint a commite to study the matter. "
Because the duties and responsibilities given to the committee are not chargeable to a specific person but to the committee as a group, it seemed to the members that he did not have full responsibility to perform the duties of this committee. There was his responsibility tepecah divisive, sometimes even several committee members felt did not have any responsibility in the implementation of the work of the committee. This is one aspect that is not good from a committee.
In addition, and in connection with the latter, then the decision taken by a committee is a formality where perhaps the architect was a certain person only, while other members only according to the course. Even the more extreme of this situation is the possibility that the smallest class of people held opinions that approved by the other faction of the largest.
The use of a committee always contain evils within him, which caused many corporate leaders tend not to use this committee.
The main evil is in addition to administrative costs may also increase the job or task is too long in doing. It is already clear that by adding a committee in the organizational structure will add administrative costs, but the worst aspect is that to take a decision on the need for a long time before the committee takes a decision first held an investigation and should be asked their opinions of each who are members of the committee concerned. Such circumstances are sometimes used by pemimipin to delay implementation of the decision. So, if someone wants something that leaders around the bush extend its implementation, then by appointing a committee on the realization that it can be. Koontz says "... That time Some committees are appointed by a manager he does not want Pls any action to Ensure ... one of the surest way to delay the handling of a problem and even to postpone indefinitely a decision is to appoint a commite to study the matter. "
Because the duties and responsibilities given to the committee are not chargeable to a specific person but to the committee as a group, it seemed to the members that he did not have full responsibility to perform the duties of this committee. There was his responsibility tepecah divisive, sometimes even several committee members felt did not have any responsibility in the implementation of the work of the committee. This is one aspect that is not good from a committee.
In addition, and in connection with the latter, then the decision taken by a committee is a formality where perhaps the architect was a certain person only, while other members only according to the course. Even the more extreme of this situation is the possibility that the smallest class of people held opinions that approved by the other faction of the largest.